From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:47:45 +0100
Commit-Message
Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the
handy readl_relaxed_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally
blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're
not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4
and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...>
Patch-Comment
changes in v3:
- switch to readl_relaxed_poll_timeout to keep original behaviour
changes in v2:
- add patch to keep rk3399 wait_lock similar to the rest
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Statistics
- 12 lines added
- 11 lines removed
Changes
@@ -585,19 +585,20 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = {
static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
{
u32 pllcon;
- int delay = 24000000;
+ int ret;
- /* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */
- while (delay > 0) {
- pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2));
- if (pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS)
- return 0;
+ /*
+ * Lock time typical 250, max 500 input clock cycles @24MHz
+ * So define a very safe maximum of 1000us, meaning 24000 cycles.
+ */
+ ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2),
+ pllcon,
+ pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS,
+ 0, 1000);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
- delay--;
- }
-
- pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ return ret;
}
static void rockchip_rk3399_pll_get_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,